Any physical relationship between a man and women does not fall under legal marriage according to Hindu law, says Bombay High Court. A child born out of such relations will not have any rights over the father’s property.
“Broadly, either customary solemnisation of marriage is required or performance of legal formality is a condition precedent to label that relationship as a marriage… Any sexual intercourse which took place by choice or by chance or by accident is not a marriage,” said Justice Mridula Bhatkar.
“In some countries, homosexual unions are accepted as marriages; so also live-in relationships and children born within such relationships have posed as complicated issues and a challenge to legal thinkers to define the term marriage whether in a wider or narrow meaning,” the judge said.
Under the Hindu Marriage Act, marriage, even if it is declared as void, has to be proved to decide the rights of the child. In the case before the court, the man had two wives. Since there was proof that the man had married a second time, the court held that though his second marriage was void, the daughter from his second wife had the right to a share of his property.
Post Your Comments